NutriMedical Report Show Wednesday Aug 21st 2019 – Hour Two – Lowell Ponte, GET FREE Books @ 800-630-1492, NO Sale Denmark to USA Greenland, Attempt By China to Set Up Airports Industry, Socialist State of Denmark, Mainly Inuit People Left, Stategic Site, Massive Clean Ice, Tech Mineral Supply, Narwal Tush Myth of Unicorns in Europe Middle Ages,

Lowell Ponte, GET FREE Books @ 800-630-1492, NO Sale Denmark to USA Greenland, Attempt By China to Set Up Airports Industry, Socialist State of Denmark, Mainly Inuit People Left, Stategic Site, Massive Clean Ice, Tech Mineral Supply, Narwal Tush Myth of Unicorns in Europe Middle Ages, Dr Bill Deagle MD AAEM ACAM A4M, NutriMedical Report Show, www.NutriMedical.com, www.ClayandIRON.com, www.Deagle-Network.com,NutriMedical Report Show,

 

 

Trump and the

Greenland New Deal

Lowell Ponte whacks environmental policies suitable for those believing in unicorns  WND, August 18, 2019

URL: https://www.wnd.com/2019/08/trump-and-the-greenland-new-deal/

Days ago the Wall Street Journal reported that, “with varying degrees of seriousness,” President Donald Trump has “repeatedly expressed interest” in buying from Denmark the world’s largest island, Greenland.

Likewise, the “future of the Democratic Party,” socialist Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, recently proposed a “Green New Deal” that would save the world from global warming by outlawing the internal combustion engine; prohibiting airline travel; ending cow flatulence, a major source of greenhouse gases, by banishing the eating of beef; and taxing nearly $100 trillion out of businesses and the wealthy.

Her Chief of Staff admitted that her so-called Green New Deal was not intended to cure world warming, declaring that it was not “a climate thing” but a “how-do-you-change-the-entire-economy thing,” as this column discussed on July 15. The Green New Deal was a pretext to use climate fears to transform our economy from capitalist to socialist. Truth-telling leftist Saikat Chakrabarti was soon removed from her staff.

In the year 986 A.D., Erik the Red led 14 boatloads of Vikings to Greenland, starting his recruitment of settlers by promising that Greenland had more fertile farmland than Iceland. This Red, like Rep. Ocasio-Cortez’s Green, used propaganda.

Some Vikings found early success in Greenland. But then the brief once-each-thousand-years cyclic medieval warming period ended and began what climatologists call the “Little Ice Age,” which lasted until 1850 and wiped out most Viking settlers. Modern archeologists documented survivors each new year dug graves more shallowly as their soil turned to rock-hard permafrost.

Today 80 percent of Greenland’s 836,330 square miles is covered with ice, which at its center is almost two miles thick. Only 56,000 settlers remain, and 90 percent are not primarily Vikings but descendants of the native Inuit peoples. Greenland has been owned since 1814 by Denmark, which provides its people an annual subsidy of $591 million, about $10,550 per person. This subsidy sustains a socialist society in which nobody owns private property, with all land controlled by five “kommunes.”

Nearly all enterprises, including health care, are at least largely government owned. Greenland is a county of Denmark, which controls its foreign policy, defense and monetary policy. But it has a kind of autonomy that permits its residents to vote for independence if they wish, although at present most are dependent on Denmark’s yearly Danegeld.

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez should love socialist Greenland, far better than the proudly capitalistic, free-enterprise, high-tax welfare state of Denmark itself. But as leftist British newspaper the Guardian admits, Greenland is riven by high unemployment, alcoholism, depression and suicide. “Schoolchildren rank abysmally on tests relative to their contemporaries in Denmark,” and teens have “growing dependence on cannabis.” Greenland suffers the usual dehumanizing nightmare caused by socialism.

So why does President Trump want a socialist island whose head of local government says that Greenland is “open for business but not for sale”?

Mr. Trump is not the first U.S. president to ponder this purchase. When Nazi Germany occupied Denmark during World War II, the U.S. took military control of Greenland in April 1941 to prevent Nazi invasion. President Harry Truman returned Greenland to Denmark immediately after the war, but he offered our good Danish allies $100 million in gold for the strategic island, an offer the Danes quietly refused.

In January 1917, Denmark did sell us today’s U.S. Virgin Islands for $25 million (dollars today worth $575.61 million, calculatesAmerican Thinker’s Tiberiu Dianu). In 1867, when Secretary of State William Seward purchased Alaska from Russia for $7.2 million, he also began drawn-out negotiations with Denmark over today’s Virgin Islands, and also considered buying Greenland and Iceland.

Today we recognize that Greenland is rich in resources: zinc, lead, copper, iron ore, coal, diamonds and oil. Canadians are already mining gold there, and Chinese are mining rare-earth elements.

Denmark nixed a 2017 Chinese attempt to buy an abandoned naval base, and in 2018 rebuffed Chinese plans to build three airports in Greenland. Denmark since 1950 has allowed the U.S. Thule Air Base, 750 miles north of the Arctic Circle, critical to our winning the Cold War.

Global warming alarmists say world sea level could rise 23 feet and submerge far-south Florida if all Greenland’s ice melted. A Greenland Trump Tower would attract those ready to fight a “new cold war” against global warming – and those who believe in unicorns.

Medieval Europeans believed in unicorns because many had seen the five to 10-foot straight spiral horns of the mythical utopian creature. In fact, these amazing horns came from narwhales that swim along Greenland’s west coast.

Harley Schlanger LaRouche Foundation Article >>>

Very interesting!  While the LaRouche movement for years has been exposing so-called environmentalists as Satanic promoters of mass genocide, to “save the planet”, finally this is breaking into the media (see below).  It is not clear yet why this is happening, other than it is so blatant that the press sewers may feel  they have to “cover their ass”.  At the same time  these stories have appeared, the press is filled with lying Doomsday “man-made climate change” scenarios, designed to clear the way for a new wave of speculative funny-money circulation to fund “green” initiatives (see LaRouchePAC for more details).

At the same time, the New York Times executive editor briefed his writers on proceeding with Phase II of the “Get Trump” coup operation.  While acknowledging that Phase I failed, he said that it was good for the Times (two Pulitzers!), and seemed to be blaming Mueller, rather than acknowledging that his paper, and the rest of the mass media, has been engaging in massive psychological warfare against President Trump and the American people.

I will be writing a full article about this in the next days.

Harley

U.K. {Guardian}: Environmentalism-Eugenics at Root of Recent Mass

Killings

Aug. 20 (EIRNS)–The Aug. 16 {Guardian} newspaper, in an article

entitled “‘Bees, Not Refugees: The Environmentalist Roots of

Anti-Immigrant Bigotry” which traces out the roots of the El Paso

shooter, enviro-fascist Patrick Crusius, reveals what readers of

LaRouche publications have known for a long-time: that, “recent

mass shootings have been linked to ‘eco-xenophobia’– part of a

tradition that dates to America’s first conservationists.” Three

days later, the leftist {Mother Jones} republished the article,

but with a more precise title, “Anti-Immigration White Supremacy

Had Deep Roots in the Environmental Movement.”

 The {Guardian} article preceded the Sunday Aug. 19

{Washington Post} article, “Two Mass Killings a World Apart Share

a Common Theme: ‘Ecofascism.'”

 Susie Cagle, author of the {Guardian} exposé, gives the

background of John Tanton, the founder of the anti-immigration

Federation for American Immigration Reform (FAIR), who, as {EIR}

documented decades ago, was a supporter of the infamous 1975-76

Paddock Plan, in which Malthusian agronomist William Paddock

proclaimed, “The Mexican population must be reduced by half….

Seal the border and watch them scream.” Paddock’s policy was

effectively endorsed by Carter’s National Security Adviser

Zbigniew Brzezinski. Paddock was also on the board of Tanton’s

FAIR. Previously, Tanton was a leader of the environmentalist

Sierra Club and the national president of the Zero Population

Growth (ZPG), which was founded in 1968 by Paul Ehrlich to

achieve mass elimination of population.

 Although reporter Cagle did not report on this crucial

background to Tanton, she did report that Tanton set the

environment for Crusius: “A hate-filled document allegedly linked

to the man suspected of killing 22 people in El Paso [Patrick

Crusius] on Aug. 3 echoed the kind of rhetoric generally favored

by the far right — and also had a decidedly environmentalist,

Tanton-like bent. The document praised the Dr. Seuss character,

the Lorax, who says he speaks for the trees, and complained about

the unsustainable overuse of paper towels, and concluded that the

best course of environmental action would be mass murder.”

 Cagle also mentioned “the eugenicist Madison Grant,” as a

friend of Teddy Roosevelt’s, but Cagle does not mention, that he

was one of the hosts of the 1921 Second International Conference

of Eugenics and the 1932 Third International Conference of

Eugenics (the latter dedicated to Mary Averell [Mrs. E.H.]

Harriman). Cagle also brought up John Muir, the founder in 1892

of the Sierra Club, who was “disturbed by the ‘uncleanliness’ of

the Native Americans, whom he wanted removed by from Yosemite”

when it was made into a National Park in California.

 None of this is a mystery. After Hitler’s British-directed

genocide, it became objectionable to call oneself a eugenicist.

Julian Huxley, rather than abandon the policy, kept it strictly

intact, using UNESCO to promote environmentalism as a new form of

eugenics. There are no “right-wing” versus “left-wing”

eugenicists, except for some finer fourth-degree points.

 During the past six weeks, the LaRouche movement has been

shining a spotlight on the intended financing, to the tune of

tens of trillions of dollars, into a City of London-directed

financial bubble for such “green” Malthusian projects. This has

compelled the oligarchs to bring out the connection between the

ecofascists and the mass murderers. Helga Zepp-LaRouche observed,

“We can put this [notch] on our belt, because nobody except us

really talks about ‘ecofascism’ in this way.” [ref]

ReplyReply allForward