NutriMedical Report Wed Dec 18th ’19 Hr 2 Lowell Ponte

Lowell Ponte, Impeachment Lynch mob politics, Impeachment, Hamilton warned, could become lawless, solely political,  Dr Bill Deagle MD AAEM ACAM A4M, NutriMedical Report Show, www.NutriMedical.com, www.ClayandIRON.com, www.Deagle-Network.com,https://www.nutrimedical.com/product-category/epigenetic-song-of-dna-therapy/,

 

 

 

Impeachment:

Lynch mob politics

Lowell Ponte says most of what Congress does every day is an ‘abuse of power’     WND Dec. 12, 2019

URL:  https://www.wnd.com/2019/12/impeachment-lynch-mob-politics/

 

“Impeachment,” says Rep. Maxine Waters, D-Calif., is “whatever Congress says it is – there is no law.”

Alexander Hamilton, the “Founding Father of our National Debt,” seemed somewhat to agree. Impeachment was “denominated political,” he wrote in Federalist Paper 65, because it was how Congress counterbalanced injuries “to the society itself.”

But even Hamilton – who favored a powerful central government and wanted to coronate George Washington for life as America’s own “King George” – recognized that impeachment could become the “greatest danger” to our republic.

Impeachment, Hamilton warned, could become lawless, solely political and “regulated more by the comparative strength of parties than the real demonstrations of innocence or guilt,” a power exploited by the “most cunning or most numerous factions.”

One antidote Hamilton proposed to prevent partisan politicians from using impeachment as a “do over” whenever they lost elections – a cynical way to remove political rivals by coup d’etat or ideological lynching – was to specify that impeachment be used to remove those guilty not of minor wrongs but only of “treason, bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors.”

“Great issues should never be forced on slender majorities,” said Thomas Jefferson. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., knows this, which is why she pledged not to call for impeachment of President Donald Trump unless a strong bipartisan majority from both parties supported it. Not a single Republican member of Congress has joined the Democratic rush to impeach, but Ms. Pelosi has buckled to an entirely partisan, political impeachment.

Pelosi’s party has been hijacked by a leftist mob following the call of Rep. Al Green, D-Texas, who proclaims that unless Trump is impeached, he will win reelection in 2020, and that Democrats can impeach him again and again if the Republican Senate majority refuses to remove the president.

The left’s intoxicated lynch mob will continue, as Hamilton warned. They are charging the president they cannot defeat at the ballot box with “abuse of power” and “obstruction of Congress.”

This is, of course, insane. The Constitution’s enumerated powers clause (Article I, Section 8) specifies the federal government’s only legitimate powers, which do not include wealth redistribution or a welfare state – more than two-thirds of all federal spending. In other words, most of what the Congress does every day is an unconstitutional “abuse of power.”

The People should impeach and remove the whole federal government, not just the president. We would certainly be justified if we went on a “tax strike,” as Ayn Rand proposed in “Atlas Shrugged.” As to the political second charge against Mr. Trump, the Congress deserves to be “obstructed” and held in contempt.

The Democratic National Committee co-funded the Steele Dossier, created through collusion with Russian intelligence and used by Democratic President Barack Obama to illegally obtain FISA warrants to surveil the presidential candidate of the rival party, as if we lived in a banana republic.

Every Democratic officeholder is therefore an accomplice in high crimes and misdemeanors, and perhaps high treason. Why have they not been removed from office and jailed pending trial themselves? Democrats are no longer morally or ethically fit to hold any office of public trust, and their necktie party must end.

In 1868, the radical Republicans impeached President Andrew Johnson, a Southerner and vice president when President Abraham Lincoln was assassinated. Republicans charged Johnson with violating the new Tenure of Office Act by firing his radical secretary of war, Edwin Stanton.

A young Republican senator from Kansas, Edmund Ross, sacrificed his political career and became a target of smears and death threats – much as Trump defenders are today – by casting the key vote against conviction that preserved Johnson’s presidency. Ross saw that if Johnson were removed, the presidency itself could be taken over by a congressional dictatorship via impeachment. The case against Johnson, he said, was unfair and the Tenure of Office Act probably unconstitutional, as the Supreme Court ruled years later.

Andrew Johnson had tried re-integrating 11 Confederate states into the Union, while radical Republican Rep. Benjamin Butler wanted these states historically destroyed – by renaming Virginia the territory of “Potomac”; North Carolina as “Cape Fear”; South Carolina, Georgia and Florida lumped together and renamed “Jackson”; Louisiana as “Jefferson”; Texas as “Houston”; and Arkansas as “Lincoln.”

After leaving Congress, Edmund Ross became a Democrat and was later made governor of the New Mexico territory by Democratic President Grover Cleveland. His courage saved the Constitution and republic.

Are any Democrats today willing to stand up to the lunatics who have hijacked their once-great party?

Lowell Ponte is a former Reader’s Digest Roving Editor. His articles have appeared in the Wall Street Journal, the New York Times and other major publications. His latest paper co-authored with Craig R. Smith, “China’s Top Secret War,” shows how to rethink several areas of investment to protect and grow your savings against the little-known economic threats the People’s Republic of China poses. For a free, postpaid copy, call toll-free 800-630-1492.

 

 

Dear Friends,

What I am requesting the President to consider and act upon the most serious threat America has ever faced that may seem to be beyond reality. But now this situation is far more serious than the Cuban Missile Crisis in 1963 or Grenada invasion in 1983 because the two-mile long airstrips at the Russian Air Force base on La Orchila island in the Caribbean Sea and at Punta Huete Airport in Central America are already operational and able to land the giant Antonov An-124 Ruslan military air transports that can carry many of the Intermediate-Range Ballistic Missiles armed with Thermonuclear Warheads, which can launch within a few minutes after landing and being unloaded to strike all regions inside the continental United States without any advance warning from Nicaragua and Venezuela in Latin America.

This is way I must ask for your support, but, please do not send me a Christmas or New Year’s card, a Holiday gift, a contribution, or any money. Instead, write your own email letter that will enable me to meet directly with the President on this extremely crucial matter by typing-in the following on your computer: “Contact the White House” and a form will appear on the screen, which will take only a few minutes to fill-out. Then write or transfer your letter and send it to the President. If you are willing to help, it could make a difference before the last two choices would be a thermonuclear war that might kill nearly every American as well as many millions of other human beings living overseas or the complete surrender of America to a supranational entity for the New World Order, which would cause you to lose all of your freedom and liberty. JWS

 

P.O. Box 18946

Anaheim, CA 92817

December 18, 2019

The President

The White House

1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW

Washington, DC 20500

RE: TAKING AIR FORCE ONE TO MEET WITH ME AT JOHN WAYNE OR MARCH

Dear Mr. President:

I would urge you to take Air Force One right away to John Wayne or March Airport in Southern California for meeting directly with me about some of our nation’s most urgent matters related to national security and foreign policy. Please, do not bring along any advisers, Cabinet members or Agency Directors who would only become distractions during this important meeting. If it would be possible, a meeting before Christmas would be ideal due to the critical issues facing us at this time. However, just after Christmas, but before New Year’s Eve would be the only alternative for meeting directly with you because the future of our nation is at stake and other matters, such as the forthcoming trial in the U.S. Senate would distract or overshadow from the importance of our meeting.

Why John Wayne or March Airport in California instead of the White House in Washington? If we were to meet at the White House, there would be too many distractions and I would prefer to keep a low profile. Also, the weather will probably be better out here and I would be also closer to my disabled wife who is making a very slow recovery from a major injury.

Our meeting will definitely improve your situation before the forthcoming trial that will be held in the chamber of the U.S. Senate. With the information I am able to provide, for the first time, you will be completely in command rather than being manipulated by power seekers from the swamp, which, unfortunately, has been the case.

Please, contact me very soon so that I can make the necessary arrangements for my ill wife.

Sincerely,

John W. Spring